DASUKI |
Embattled former National Security Adviser,
NSA, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), has told a Federal High Court in Abuja that
investors confidence in the country is being negatively affected by Federal
Government’s refusal to obey court orders.
Dasuki, who was speaking through his counsel,
Mr. Joseph Daodu SAN, on Thursday, urged the Justice Adeniyi Ademola-led court
to halt his trial until the government complied with its order granting him
bail.
“How will the government look like at the end
of the day? Will investors be confident in this country when court make orders,
but they are not obeyed?” he said.
It would be recalled that Justice Ademola had
in November, 2015, granted Dasuki bail, but he was rearrested immediately after
his release from Kuje prison by the Department of State Services, DSS. On
February 16, Dipo Okpeseyi SAN, counsel to the DSS, had announced to the court
that the prosecution was ready for trial to commence.
But Daodu said that the defence counsel was not
ready to proceed with the trial because the federal government was still
keeping the accused person in detention despite an order of the court granting
him bail.
“We cannot be ready for trial until the defendant enjoys his constitutional
rights,” he had said.
“We apply that we should be given time to
prepare the defence. The conduct of the prosecution has not enabled him to
enjoy his constitutional rights.
“The worst is that for about seven weeks we do
not know where he is.
“Any of us here who proceed to defend an
accused person in this circumstance may lose his license of practice.”
However, counsel to the DSS argued that the
prosecution was not stopping Dasuki from enjoying his freedom, but quickly
pointed out that the accused person was not being allegedly held for the
charges before the court.
He therefore asked the court to reject the
request for adjournment and to commence trial.
At the resumption of proceeding on Thursday,
both parties argued for and against Dasuki’s application for discharge with the
prosecution restating its position that the accused person was being held for a
different offence.
The court, thereafter, fixed April 4, 2016 for
ruling on the application.
No comments:
Post a Comment