BY
SHELLY FAN
A cognitive
neuroscientist and his team at HRL Laboratories in Malibu, California, seem to
have achieved the impossible.
According to a press
release, the team “measured the brain activity patterns of six
commercial and military pilots, and then transmitted these patterns into novice
subjects as they learned to pilot an airplane in a realistic flight simulator.”
If you’re picturing people downloading knowledge directly into the brain
Matrix-style, sorry to hand you the blue pill — it’s utter nonsense.
Which is a total shame,
because the brain-boosting technique used in the study — transcranial direct
current stimulation, or tDCS, is nothing short of fantastical.
Hook up some wires with a
9-volt battery, and you have a state-of-art “thinking cap” that activates
select regions of the brain of your choosing. By directly tinkering with the
brain’s electrical field — no surgery required — tDCS has the potential to
treat depression, anxiety, chronic
pain, OCD and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s
disease.
A handful of small studies —
including the HRL Laboratories research — also tantalizingly suggest that it
could heighten creativity, enhance spatial
learning, boost math skills and language
acquisition and even trigger lucid dreams — sometimes weeks after the initial stimulation.
“It seems to give you any kind
of benefit you want,” says Dr. Flavio Frohlich, a neurobiologist at the
University of North Carolina and expert in tDCS-assisted cognition.
Sound too good to be true?
Perhaps. Ask its doubters, and the only thing that tDCS is good at is giving
people a nasty electrical burn.
It’s high-tech brain gain
riding the hype cycle train. Here’re the facts and the fiction — let’s see how
deep the rabbit hole goes.
How
Does tDCS Work?
The short answer: no one
really knows.
The technique’s brain-boosting
effects were discovered serendipitously. At the turn of the last century, Drs.
Walter Paulus and Michael Nitsche at the University of Göttingen in Germany
popularized the technique while studying motor learning and working memory.
They carefully placed two electrodes over motor regions of the brain, using gel
to ensure full contact with the scalp. This generates a weak electrical current
— about 1 or 2 milliamps, low enough to be powered by a 9-volt battery.
To the team’s surprise,
participants receiving the stimulation learned faster than those who received
only sham stimulation — a placebo zap to trick them into thinking they were
getting the treatment. Almost all later studies followed this protocol,
including the aforementioned flight simulator study.
So what’s happening to the
brain?
The tDCS current itself is too
weak to activate neurons; instead it changes the ability of neurons to
respond
to stimuli, such as learning a new task. There are two types of stimulation:
anodal stimulation primes neurons to be more excitable and thus more likely to
fire, boosting signal; cathodal stimulation makes it harder for neurons to
fire, decreasing noise.
In this way, tDCS can modulate
the signal-to-noise ratio in a select brain region and tweak information
processing. The word “tweak” here is key. tDCS doesn’t transfer meaningful
information — it only improves the ability of subjects to learn.
At the same time, the current
jolts plasticity-related molecules into action in neurons, changing their
ability to respond to neurotransmitters.
But it goes even deeper than
that. In a study published earlier this week, scientists
at the Office of Naval Research found that tDCS in mice strips away certain
molecular markers on their DNA. This causes neurons to pump out more BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), a major
vitality-boosting protein that promotes synaptic plasticity and the birth of
new neurons and nurtures the brain.
These molecular changes could
be why tDCS has long-lasting effects that linger for weeks, suggested the
authors in their paper.
That said, it’s currently
impossible to precisely target neural networks with tDCS in the way that optogenetics can. The current only flows in
superficial layers of the cortex, rarely reaching deeper brain regions such as
the hippocampus, a central hub for learning and memory.
And what happens to the rest
of the brain during stimulation? Your guess is as good as mine.
Boost
or Bust
Given the uncertainty in how
tDCS works, it’s perhaps not surprising that it doesn’t always work.
Several past meta-analyses
cast serious doubt on the tech’s brain-boosting powers. Two such papers, both
from the University of Melbourne, found that single-session tDCS had “little-to-no” reliable effect on executive
function, language or memory in healthy young volunteers.
There are also disheartening
reports that in some cases, zapping the brain impedes cognition.
Last year, Frohlich and
colleagues published a report suggesting stimulation lowers
IQ scores. His team measured the IQ of 40 healthy volunteers, then zapped them
with either sham or real tDCS for 20 minutes over frontal areas of the brain —
specifically, the prefrontal cortex involved in flexible thinking and higher
reasoning. When retested, people receiving tDCS performed worse than the
non-stimulated controls.
Another team found that although tDCS could speed up the
learning process — associating Egyptian-like symbols with numbers — it impaired
the volunteers from automatically using this new knowledge in subsequent tests.
The authors dubbed their finding “the mental cost of
cognitive enhancement.”
The Red
Pill
Despite potential perils,
optimism for the tech remains sky high.
The promise is so great that
tDCS was featured in the prestigious academic journal Nature
this week, with scientists warning against overzealous DIY use, already
commercially available to biohackers for about $150 a pop.
Stimulating is easy, but doing
it right is not, said Frohlich. Commercially available units aren’t regulated,
and it takes at least some training to be able to correctly place the
electrodes without injuring the scalp.
And since we still don’t
understand the long-term effects (not to mention potential side-effects) of
tDCS, it’s far too early to call the technique totally safe.
“People may well be damaging
their brains,” said Frohlich.
For now, the benefits aren’t
worth the risk. As the story continues, however, that could change.
Electrodes get smaller all the
time, making it increasingly possible to more precisely modulate brain
activity. Although at the moment it’s hard to imagine targeting only a handful
of neural networks using tDCS, it’s conceivable that next-gen non-invasive
brain stimulation could dramatically improve in specificity.
More specific brain
stimulation means more specific behavior outcomes.
There are already hints of
this possibility: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which uses magnetic
fields to modulate brain activity, is already used in brain-to-brain communication, where scientists
stimulate a receiver’s brain with EEG waves recorded from an encoder performing
simple tasks.
There’s a hell lot of
controversy, but preliminary (published) results show that the
encoder’s brain waves contain enough information to cause specific motor
responses in the receiver, such as moving his hand in a certain way.
Now imagine an expert’s brain
waves “teaching” a novice on complicated tasks.
Here, tDCS will prime the
novice’s brain to better encode and retrieve new information. This is, in fact,
what the press
release mentioned earlier hinted at: that expert pilots’ brain waves
helped newbies master a flight simulator.
That’s not the case — the tDCS
used in that study was run-of-the-mill steady currents, not fancy EEG
recordings. But in a few decades? We probably still won’t be able to “download
knowledge” or “program learning” directly into our brain.
We’ll just be learning really,
really fast.
Shelly Fan
Shelly Xuelai Fan is a neuroscientist at the University of California, San Francisco, where she studies ways to make old brains young again. In addition to research, she's also an avid science writer with an insatiable obsession with biotech, AI and all things neuro. She spends her spare time kayaking, bike camping and getting lost in the woods.
No comments:
Post a Comment